Article Text
PDFCommentary
Why we can't really say what post-persons are
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Linked article 100126
Competing interests None.
Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
Linked Articles
- Commentary
- Commentary
- Feature article
- Commentary
- The concise argument
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Why is it possible to enhance moral status and why doing so is wrong?
- Reply to commentators on Unfit for the Future
- ‘My child will never initiate Ultimate Harm’: an argument against moral enhancement
- Still unconvinced, but still tentative: a reply to DeGrazia
- Still afraid of needy post-persons
- Technological moral enhancement or traditional moral progress? Why not both?
- Genetic enhancement, post-persons and moral status: a reply to Buchanan
- Too good for this world: moral bioenhancement and the ethics of making moral misfits
- Highlights from this issue
- Putting a price on empathy: against incentivising moral enhancement