Article info
PDFCommentary
Persons, post-persons and thresholds
- Correspondence to Dr James Wilson, University College London, Centre for Philosophy, Justice and Health, Comprehensive Biomedical Research Centre (1st Floor Maple House), Ground Floor, Rosenheim Building, London WC1E 6DB, UK; james-gs.wilson{at}ucl.ac.uk
Citation
Persons, post-persons and thresholds
Publication history
- Received September 17, 2011
- Revised September 21, 2011
- Accepted September 30, 2011
- First published December 3, 2011.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Article Versions
- Previous version (27 April 2016).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© 2012, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
Other content recommended for you
- Genetic enhancement, post-persons and moral status: a reply to Buchanan
- The biomedical enhancement of moral status
- Infanticide and moral consistency
- Why is it possible to enhance moral status and why doing so is wrong?
- Highlights from this issue
- Self-serving bias and the structure of moral status
- Genetic Enhancement, Post-persons, and Moral Status: Author reply to commentaries
- The ethical justification for the use of non-human primates in research: the Weatherall report revisited
- Still afraid of needy post-persons
- A flimsy case for the use of non-human primates in research: a reply to Arnason