Findings from a Delphi exercise regarding conflicts of interests, general practitioners and safeguarding children: ‘Listen carefully, judge slowly’
Share this article
Click the icon of the social media platform on which you would like to share this article.
Email this article to a friend
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Other content recommended for you
- Understanding general practitioners' conflicts of interests and the paramountcy principle in safeguarding children
- The use of vignettes within a Delphi exercise: a useful approach in empirical ethics?
- Responses to concerns about child maltreatment: a qualitative study of GPs in England
- Top research priorities in liver and gallbladder disorders in the UK
- Definition of remission and relapse in polymyalgia rheumatica: data from a literature search compared with a Delphi-based expert consensus
- Technical capacities needed to implement the WHO’s primary eye care package for Africa: results of a Delphi process
- Priorities for collaborative research using very preterm birth cohorts
- Oxford consensus on primary cam morphology and femoroacetabular impingement syndrome: part 2—research priorities on conditions affecting the young person’s hip
- The concise argument
- Oxford consensus on primary cam morphology and femoroacetabular impingement syndrome: part 1—definitions, terminology, taxonomy and imaging outcomes