Article info
The concise argument
Highlights from this issue
Citation
Highlights from this issue
Publication history
- First published January 20, 2012.
Online issue publication
January 20, 2012
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© 2012, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
Other content recommended for you
- Opt-out organ donation without presumptions
- Tacitly opting out of organ donation: too presumptuous after all?
- The burden of normality: from ‘chronically ill’ to ‘symptom free’. New ethical challenges for deep brain stimulation postoperative treatment
- Approaches to neuromodulation for schizophrenia
- Ethical examination of deep brain stimulation’s ‘last resort’ status
- No going back? Reversibility and why it matters for deep brain stimulation
- Opt-out donation and tacit consent: a reply to Wilkinson and De Wispelaere
- Highlights from this issue
- Charting the road forward in psychiatric neurosurgery: proceedings of the 2016 American Society for Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery workshop on neuromodulation for psychiatric disorders
- Opt-out organ procurement and tacit consent