Article info
PDFResearch ethics
Paper
Discrepancy between participants' understanding and desire to know in informed consent: are they informed about what they really want to know?
- Correspondence to Dr Eurah Goh, Department of Family Medicine, Kangwon National University Hospital, 26 Kangwon Daehakro, Chuncheon, Kangwon Province 200-722, South Korea; eurah.ko{at}gmail.com
Citation
Discrepancy between participants' understanding and desire to know in informed consent: are they informed about what they really want to know?
Publication history
- Received October 24, 2010
- Revised May 12, 2011
- Accepted May 24, 2011
- First published June 27, 2011.
Online issue publication
January 20, 2012
Article Versions
- Previous version (27 June 2011).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© 2012, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
Other content recommended for you
- Qualitative study investigating the underlying motivations of healthy participants in phase I clinical trials
- Parallel multicentre randomised trial of a clinical trial question prompt list in patients considering participation in phase 3 cancer treatment trials
- Evaluating stress, satisfaction and the associated influencing factors of participants in cancer clinical trials: a cross-sectional study in China
- Sociodemographic and psychological characteristics influencing patients’ willingness to participate in clinical trials
- Cross-sectional assessment of patient attitudes towards participation in clinical trials: does making results publicly available matter?
- Phase I oncology trials: why the therapeutic misconception will not go away
- Cancer clinical research in Latin America: current situation and opportunities. Expert opinion from the first ESMO workshop on clinical trials, Lima, 2015
- Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial of enhanced informed consent compared to standard informed consent to improve patient understanding of early phase oncology clinical trials (CONSENT)
- Informed consent as an ethical requirement in clinical trials: an old, but still unresolved issue. An observational study to evaluate patient's informed consent comprehension
- Perspectives of people with inherited retinal diseases on ocular gene therapy in Australia: protocol for a national survey