Article Text
Abstract
Objectives To analyse the perspective of clinical research stakeholders concerning post-trial access to study medication.
Methods Questionnaires and informed consents were sent through e-mail to 599 ethics committee (EC) members, 290 clinical investigators (HIV/AIDS and Diabetes) and 53 sponsors in Brazil. Investigators were also asked to submit the questionnaire to their research patients. Two reminders were sent to participants.
Results The response rate was 21%, 20% and 45% in EC, investigators and sponsors’ groups, respectively. 54 patients answered the questionnaire through their doctors. The least informative item in the consent form was how to obtain the study medication after trial. If a benefit were demonstrated in the study, 60% of research participants and 35% of EC answered that all patients should continue receiving study medication after trial; 43% of investigators believed the medication should be given to participants, and 40% to subjects who participated and benefited from treatment. For 50% of the sponsors, study medication should be assured to participants who had benefited from treatment. The majority of responders answered that medication should be provided free by sponsors; investigators and sponsors believed the medication should be kept until available in the public health sector; EC members said that the patient should keep the benefit; patients answered that benefits should be assured for life.
Conclusions Due to the study limitations, the results cannot be generalised; however, the data can contribute to discussion of this complex topic through analysing the views of stakeholders in clinical research in Brazil.
- Clinical Ethics
- Informed Consent
- Research Ethics
- Scientific Research
- Public Health Ethics
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Linked Articles
- The concise argument
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Ethics Committee or Community? examining the identity of Czech Ethics Committees in the period of transition
- Implementing post-trial access plans for HIV prevention research
- What empirical research has been undertaken on the ethics of clinical research in India? A systematic scoping review and narrative synthesis
- Education of ethics committee members: experiences from Croatia
- Preventing ethics conflicts and improving healthcare quality through system redesign
- Harmonisation of ethics committees' practice in 10 European countries
- Investigation of post-trial access views among study participants and stakeholders using photovoice and semistructured interviews
- The promise and pitfalls of social science research in an emergency: lessons from studying the Zika epidemic in Brazil, 2015–2016
- Post-trial access to implantable neural devices: an exploratory international survey
- Subjects’ views of obligations to ensure post-trial access to drugs, care and information: qualitative results from the Experiences of Participants in Clinical Trials (EPIC) study