Article Text
Response
Deciphering the appropriateness of defaults: the need for domain-specific evidence
Abstract
In this issue of The Journal of Medical Ethics, xxx and colleagues report a randomized trial of the influence of default options on delivery room management of an extremely premature infant. They report that among respondents to the hypothetical vignette, those who received the resuscitation default were significantly more likely to choose resuscitation compared with those who were told that the default was comfort care. While the results warrant attention and further investigation, several methodological shortcomings limit the conclusions that can be drawn from this study.
- Death education
- suicide/assisted suicide
- substance abusers/users of controlled substances
- right to refuse treatment
- research ethics
- elderly and terminally ill
- living wills/advance directives
- healthcare economics
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
-
Competing interests None.
-
Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
Linked Articles
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Default options and neonatal resuscitation decisions
- Opinions of paediatricians who teach neonatal resuscitation about resuscitation practices on extremely preterm infants in the delivery room
- Quality of essential newborn care and neonatal resuscitation at health facilities in Afghanistan: a cross-sectional assessment
- Human or monitor feedback to improve mask ventilation during simulated neonatal cardiopulmonary resuscitation
- 2022 Eastern Regional Meeting
- Pulmonary air leak associated with CPAP at term birth resuscitation
- Ethical dilemmas of recording and reviewing neonatal resuscitation
- Frequent refresher training on newborn resuscitation and potential impact on perinatal outcome over time in a rural Tanzanian hospital: an observational study
- Comparing the utility of a novel neonatal resuscitation cart with a generic code cart using simulation: a randomised, controlled, crossover trial
- Chest compression during sustained inflation versus 3:1 chest compression:ventilation ratio during neonatal cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a randomised feasibility trial