Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Shared decision making has been officially supported by every major critical care organisation in the USA and Europe, the American Medical Association, the American Academy of Pediatrics, and others.1–3 Indeed, the first recommendation in the American College of Critical Care Medicine's guidelines for family support is that healthcare providers should partner with families in making difficult choices.4 In the USA and elsewhere, too often have doctors shied away from active participation in decision making due to a mistaken belief that value-laden decisions should be made only by patients or their surrogate decision makers.1
In order to provide optimal care, doctors must be willing and able to bear some, or at times the majority, of the burden when difficult decisions must be made. Indeed, shared decision making is best understood as a continuum ranging from patient-driven decision making, through an equal partnership with care providers, to fully physician-driven decision making.5 How the team of patient, family and providers balance the burdens and responsibilities of decision making should generally be driven by the wishes of the patient or the surrogate decision maker.
Empirical research supports the need for flexibility in decision making. Data from US studies show that most people want their doctor to be an active participant in value-laden decision making.6 ,7 Indeed, these studies report that about 1 in 10 people prefer that the doctor makes the major decisions, including the decision to continue life-prolonging therapies, or …
Competing interests None.
Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Prognostication and shared decision making in neurocritical care
- Ethics of the algorithmic prediction of goal of care preferences: from theory to practice
- Re-engineering shared decision-making
- Development and evaluation of a decision aid for family surrogate decision-makers for patients with acute kidney injury requiring renal replacement therapy (RRT) in ICUs: a study protocol
- In the patient’s best interest: appraising social network site information for surrogate decision making
- Can shared decision making increase the uptake of evidence in clinical practice?
- Doctors’ perspectives on adhering to advance care directives when making medical decisions for patients: an Australian interview study
- Professionals’ views on shared decision-making in severe aortic stenosis
- Shared decision-making in stroke: an evolving approach to improved patient care
- How can clinical practice guidelines be adapted to facilitate shared decision making? A qualitative key-informant study