Objective To determine whether presenting delivery room management options as defaults influences decisions to resuscitate extremely premature infants.
Materials and methods Adult volunteers recruited from the world wide web were randomised to receive either resuscitation or comfort care as the delivery room management default option for a hypothetical delivery of a 23-week gestation infant. Participants were required to check a box to opt out of the default. The primary outcome measure was the proportion of respondents electing resuscitation. Data were analysed using χ2 tests and multivariate logistic regression.
Results Participants who were told the delivery room management default option was resuscitation were more likely to opt for resuscitation (OR 6.54 95% CI 3.85 to 11.11, p<0.001). This effect persisted on multivariate regression analysis (OR 7.00, 95% CI 3.97 to 12.36, p<0.001). Female gender, being married or in a committed relationship, being highly religious, experiences with prematurity, and favouring sanctity of life were significantly associated with decisions to resuscitate.
Discussion Presenting delivery room options for extremely premature infants as defaults exert a significant effect on decision makers. The information structure of the choice task may act as a subtle form of manipulation. Further, this effect may operate in ways that a decision maker is not aware of and this raises questions of patient autonomy.
Conclusion Presenting delivery room options for extremely premature infants as defaults may compromise autonomous decision-making.
- comfort care
- extreme prematurity
- newborns and minors
- clinical ethics
- demographic surveys/attitudes
- informed consent
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Funding This study was supported by Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons.
Competing interests None.
Ethics approval Ethics approval was provided by Columbia University Institutional Review Board.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Data sharing statement Please note: Although required ‘permission to use images’ question was checked off, no images, tables or figures come from previously published materials. All tables and the appendix are constructed by the authors (Haward, Murphy, Lorenz) for this article only and reflect original work.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Deciphering the appropriateness of defaults: the need for domain-specific evidence
- Delivery room deaths of extremely preterm babies: an observational study
- Do differences in delivery room intubation explain different rates of bronchopulmonary dysplasia between hospitals?
- Auditing documentation on delivery room management using video and physiological recordings
- Deferred consent for delivery room studies: the providers’ perspective
- Default options in advance directives: study protocol for a randomised clinical trial
- Resuscitation of infants with congenital diaphragmatic hernia
- Change in practice after the Surfactant, Positive Pressure and Oxygenation Randomised Trial
- Perinatal palliative care: a dedicated care pathway
- Delivery room management of extremely preterm infants: the EPIPAGE-2 study