You are here

Article Text

Article menu
Download PDFPDF
Commentaries
Editorial note on ‘Abortion and regret’
  1. Kenneth Boyd
  1. Correspondence to Professor Kenneth Boyd, Biomedical Teaching Organisation, Edinburgh University, Medical School, Teviot Place, Edinburgh EH8 9AG, UK; K.Boyd{at}ed.ac.uk

https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2012-100993

Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    The moral permissibility of abortion is an emotionally charged issue. That it should engage the heart as well as the head is entirely appropriate, since matters of life and death are at stake. But it is no less appropriate that the moral status, rights, and duties …

    View Full Text

    Footnotes

    • Competing interests None.

    • Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.

    Linked Articles

    • Feature article
      Abortion and regret
      Kate Greasley
      Journal of Medical Ethics 2012; 38 705-711 Published Online First: 28 Aug 2012. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2012-100522
    • The concise argument
      Highlights from this issue
      Bennett Foddy
      Journal of Medical Ethics 2012; 38 703-704 Published Online First: 23 Nov 2012. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2012-101211