Article Text
PDFPapers
Clinical ethics
Jehovah's Witnesses and autonomy: honouring the refusal of blood transfusions
Abstract
This paper explores the scriptural and theological reasons given by Jehovah's Witnesses (JWs) to refuse blood transfusions. Julian Savulescu and Richard W Momeyer argue that informed consent should be based on rational beliefs and that the refusal of blood transfusions by JWs is irrational, but after examining the reasons given by JWs, I challenge the claim that JW beliefs are irrational. I also question whether we should give up the traditional notion of informed consent.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Linked Articles
- The concise argument
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Applying the four principles
- Medical confidentiality and the protection of Jehovah's Witnesses' autonomous refusal of blood
- Why some Jehovah's Witnesses accept blood and conscientiously reject official Watchtower Society blood policy
- Jehovah’s Witnesses in the emergency department: what are their rights?
- The ethics of policy writing: how should hospitals deal with moral disagreement about controversial medical practices?
- Refusal of potentially life-saving blood transfusions by Jehovah's Witnesses: should doctors explain that not all JWs think it's religiously required?
- Principlism and communitarianism
- Children of Jehovah’s Witnesses and adolescent Jehovah’s Witnesses: what are their rights?
- Acquired haemophilia A in a patient who is a Jehovah’s Witness
- Bioethical aspects of the recent changes in the policy of refusal of blood by Jehovah's Witnesses