Article info
Response
Whose ethics of knowledge? Taking the next step in evaluating knowledge in synthetic biology: a response to Douglas and Savulescu
- Correspondence to Dr Robin Pierce, Biotechnology and Society, Department of Biotechnology, Delft University of Technology, Julianalaan 67, Delft 2628 BC, The Netherlands; pierce7{at}post.harvard.edu; r.l.pierce{at}tudelft.nl
Citation
Whose ethics of knowledge? Taking the next step in evaluating knowledge in synthetic biology: a response to Douglas and Savulescu
Publication history
- Received February 10, 2012
- Revised April 13, 2012
- Accepted May 23, 2012
- First published July 4, 2012.
Online issue publication
September 25, 2012
Article Versions
- Previous version (4 July 2012).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions
Other content recommended for you
- Synthetic biology and the ethics of knowledge
- Biodefence and the production of knowledge: rethinking the problem
- US government report recommends a “principle of regulatory parsimony” for synthetic biology
- Beyond informed consent: the therapeutic misconception and trust
- In critique of anthropocentrism: a more-than-human ethical framework for antimicrobial resistance
- Longitudinal study of correlates of modern contraceptive use and impact of HIV care programmes among HIV concordant and serodiscordant couples in Rakai, Uganda
- Heterogeneity in the measurement and reporting of outcomes in studies of electronic cigarette use in adolescents: a systematic analysis of observational studies
- The ethics of biosafety considerations in gain-of-function research resulting in the creation of potential pandemic pathogens
- Academic freedom and global health
- Design, fiction and the medical humanities