Until recently, moral case deliberation (MCD) sessions have mostly been facilitated by external experts, mainly professional ethicists. We have developed a train the facilitator programme for healthcare professionals aimed at providing them with the competences needed for being an MCD facilitator. In this paper, we present the first results of a study in which we evaluated the programme. We used a mixed methods design. One hundred and twenty trained healthcare professionals and five trainers from 16 training groups working in different healthcare organisations throughout the Netherlands were included. After completion of the programme, participants feel sufficiently confident and equipped to facilitate an MCD session. Feeling competent does not mean that participants have no doubts or questions left. Rather, they are aware of their limitations and see the need for continuous learning. According to the respondents, the actual exercise of facilitating MCD during and in between the training sessions contributed most to the development of competences necessary for being an MCD facilitator. Respondents without prior experience of participating in MCD sessions felt less competent after the training than those who had participated in MCD sessions before. Self-attributed competence varied between participants with different professional backgrounds.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Teaching ethics in the clinic. The theory and practice of moral case deliberation
- Morisprudence: a theoretical framework for studying the relationship linking moral case deliberation, organisational learning and quality improvement
- Moral case deliberation
- Important outcomes of moral case deliberation: a Euro-MCD field survey of healthcare professionals’ priorities
- Need for ethics support in healthcare institutions: views of Dutch board members and ethics support staff
- Materialising and fostering organisational morisprudence through ethics support tools
- Towards organisational quality in ethics through patterns and process
- Relevance of a normative framework for evaluating the impact of clinical ethics support services in healthcare
- Evaluation of clinical ethics support services and its normativity
- Measuring the impact of clinical ethics support services: further points for consideration