Article Text
Abstract
It is widely agreed that medical researchers who conduct studies in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) are morally required to ensure that their research benefits the broader host community, not only the subjects. The justification for this moral requirement has not been adequately examined. Most attempts to justify this requirement focus on researchers' interaction with the community as a whole, not on their relationship with their subjects. This paper argues that in some cases, research must benefit the broader host community for researchers to treat subjects and prospective subjects ethically. If research presents substantial net risks to subjects, researchers can ethically ask LMIC citizens to participate only if people in LMICs, normally including people in the host community, stand to benefit.
- Research ethics
- international affairs
- distributive justice
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
-
Competing interests None.
-
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Protections for clinical trials in low and middle income countries need strengthening not weakening
- Avoiding exploitation in multinational covid-19 vaccine trials
- A comparison of justice frameworks for international research
- It is not too late to achieve global covid-19 vaccine equity
- Decolonising human rights: how intellectual property laws result in unequal access to the COVID-19 vaccine
- Research for Health Justice: an ethical framework linking global health research to health equity
- Growth in Tobacco Control publications by authors from low- and middle-income countries
- Bearing the brunt of covid-19: older people in low and middle income countries
- Is youth smoking responsive to cigarette prices? Evidence from low- and middle-income countries
- Conference equity in global health: a systematic review of factors impacting LMIC representation at global health conferences