Prescription requirements: a reply to Taylor, Martin and Eyal
Share this article
Click the icon of the social media platform on which you would like to share this article.
Email this article to a friend
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Other content recommended for you
- Three arguments against prescription requirements
- The value of autonomy and the right to self-medication
- Advance decisions in dementia: when the past conflicts with the present
- Double standards and arguments for tobacco regulation
- Reconciling informed consent with prescription drug requirements
- Commentary on ‘Three arguments against prescription requirements’
- Ethics of placebo use in clinical practice: why we need to look beyond deontology
- Highlights from this issue
- Substituted decision making and the dispositional choice account
- Theoretical resources for a globalised bioethics