Article Text
PDFCommentaries
Prescription requirements: a reply to Taylor, Martin and Eyal
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Competing interests None.
Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
Linked Articles
- Feature article
- Commentaries
- The concise argument
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Three arguments against prescription requirements
- The value of autonomy and the right to self-medication
- Advance decisions in dementia: when the past conflicts with the present
- Double standards and arguments for tobacco regulation
- Reconciling informed consent with prescription drug requirements
- Commentary on ‘Three arguments against prescription requirements’
- Ethics of placebo use in clinical practice: why we need to look beyond deontology
- Highlights from this issue
- Substituted decision making and the dispositional choice account
- Theoretical resources for a globalised bioethics