Article info
Feature article
Three arguments against prescription requirements
- Correspondence to Jessica Flanigan, Jepson School of Leadership Studies, University of Richmond, Richmond, Virginia, USA; jessica.flanigan{at}gmail.com
Citation
Three arguments against prescription requirements
Publication history
- Received September 15, 2011
- Revised March 8, 2012
- Accepted March 16, 2012
- First published July 26, 2012.
Online issue publication
September 25, 2012
Article Versions
- Previous version (26 July 2012).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions
Other content recommended for you
- The value of autonomy and the right to self-medication
- Advance decisions in dementia: when the past conflicts with the present
- Communication of anticancer drug benefits and related uncertainties to patients and clinicians: document analysis of regulated information on prescription drugs in Europe
- Prescription requirements: a reply to Taylor, Martin and Eyal
- Reconciling informed consent with prescription drug requirements
- Highlights from this issue
- Cannabis, cannabis everywhere: UK to review medical cannabis policy as Canada plans imminent legalisation for all uses
- Implementation of medicinal cannabis in Australia: innovation or upheaval? Perspectives from physicians as key informants, a qualitative analysis
- Bioethics in a clinic for women with psychosis
- Refusal rights, law and medical paternalism in Turkey