Article info
PDFClinical ethics
Paper
Innovative surgery: the ethical challenges
- Correspondence to Professor Wendy Rogers, Department of Philosophy, Macquarie University North Ryde NSW 2109, Australia; wendy.rogers{at}mq.edu.au
Citation
Innovative surgery: the ethical challenges
Publication history
- Received December 23, 2010
- Revised April 18, 2011
- Accepted May 24, 2011
- First published June 22, 2011.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Article Versions
- Previous version (27 April 2016).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© 2011, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
Other content recommended for you
- Is surgical mystique a myth and double standard the reality?
- European Glaucoma Society – A guide on surgical innovation for glaucoma
- Protocol for the systematic review of the reporting of transoral robotic surgery
- Adoption of a novel surgical innovation into clinical practice: protocol for a qualitative systematic review examining surgeon views
- Discussing surgical innovation with patients: a qualitative study of surgeons’ and governance representatives’ views
- Historiographies of surgical innovation: endoscopic endonasal pituitary surgery
- IDEAL framework for surgical innovation 1: the idea and development stages
- ‘DISSEMINATE’: a roadmap for facilitating adoption of affordable surgical innovations in low and middle-income countries
- Development of reporting guidance and core outcome sets for seamless, standardised evaluation of innovative surgical procedures and devices: a study protocol for content generation and a Delphi consensus process (COHESIVE study)
- Qualitative documentary analysis of guidance on information provision and consent for the introduction of innovative invasive procedures including surgeries within NHS organisations’ policies in England and Wales