Innovative surgery raises four kinds of ethical challenges: potential harms to patients; compromised informed consent; unfair allocation of healthcare resources; and conflicts of interest. Lack of adequate data on innovations and lack of regulatory oversight contribute to these ethical challenges. In this paper these issues and the extent to which problems may be resolved by better evidence-gathering and more comprehensive regulation are explored. It is suggested that some ethical issues will be more resistant to resolution than others, owing to special features of both surgery and innovation.
- Ethics of innovative surgery
- informed consent
- conflicts of interest
- research ethics
- surgical ethics
- applied and professional ethics
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Competing interests None.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Is surgical mystique a myth and double standard the reality?
- Protocol for the systematic review of the reporting of transoral robotic surgery
- Adoption of a novel surgical innovation into clinical practice: protocol for a qualitative systematic review examining surgeon views
- Discussing surgical innovation with patients: a qualitative study of surgeons’ and governance representatives’ views
- Historiographies of surgical innovation: endoscopic endonasal pituitary surgery
- IDEAL framework for surgical innovation 1: the idea and development stages
- Development of reporting guidance and core outcome sets for seamless, standardised evaluation of innovative surgical procedures and devices: a study protocol for content generation and a Delphi consensus process (COHESIVE study)
- Qualitative documentary analysis of guidance on information provision and consent for the introduction of innovative invasive procedures including surgeries within NHS organisations’ policies in England and Wales
- Identification of outcomes to inform the development of a core outcome set for surgical innovation: a targeted review of case studies of novel surgical devices
- Macquarie Surgical Innovation Identification Tool (MSIIT): a study protocol for a usability and pilot test