Article info
PDFTheoretical ethics
Brief abstract
Sparrow's song revisited
- Correspondence to John Harris, Institute for Science, Ethics and Innovation, School of Law, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK; john.harris{at}manchester.ac.uk
Citation
Sparrow's song revisited
Publication history
- Accepted August 9, 2011
- First published September 24, 2011.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Article Versions
- Previous version (27 April 2016).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© 2011, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
Other content recommended for you
- Sparrows, hedgehogs and castrati: reflections on gender and enhancement
- Sexual dimorphism and human enhancement
- Highlights from this issue
- Fear of a female planet: how John Harris came to endorse eugenic social engineering
- Reform, not destroy: reply to McMahan, Sparrow and Temkin
- Genetic modification of characteristic masculine traits: enhancement or deformity?
- Enhancing debate about the sexes
- Throwing the baby out with the bathwater: a critique of Sparrow's inclusive definition of the term ‘in vitro eugenics’
- Enhancement: are ethicists excessively influenced by baseless speculations?
- Stem cell-derived gametes, iterated in vitro reproduction, and genetic parenthood