The charge of complicity has been raised in debates over the ethics of fetal tissue transplantation and embryonic stem cell research. However, the applicability of the concept of complicity to these types of research is neither clear nor uncontroversial. This article discusses the historical case of Julius Hallervorden, a distinguished German neuropathologist who conducted research on brains of mentally handicapped patients killed in the context of the Nazi ‘euthanasia’ programme. It is argued that this case constitutes a paradigm of complicity in research that is useful in assessing complicity in contemporary research ethics.
- Mentally disabled persons
- embryos and fetuses
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
The opinions expressed are the views of the author and do not necessarily reflect the policy of the National Institutes of Health, the Public Health Service, or the US Department of Health and Human Services.
Funding This research was supported by the Intramural Research Program of the Clinical Center, NIH.
Competing interests None.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Despising the weak: long shadows of infant murder in Nazi Germany
- Is a consensus possible on stem cell research? Moral and political obstacles
- Why two arguments from probability fail and one argument from Thomson’s analogy of the violinist succeeds in justifying embryo destruction in some situations
- What’s in a name? Embryos, entities, and ANTities in the stem cell debate
- Ethics of dead participants: policy recommendations for biobank research
- How to depolarise the ethical debate over human embryonic stem cell research (and other ethical debates too!)
- Abortion, embryo destruction and the future of value argument
- The need for donor consent in mitochondrial replacement
- To protect or to publish: confidentiality and the fate of the mentally ill victims of Nazi euthanasia
- A long shadow: Nazi doctors, moral vulnerability and contemporary medical culture