From the perspective of investigators conducting research involving pregnant women and fetuses, a woman's decision about whether to have an abortion can sometimes be relevant to the suitability of the woman and fetus as research subjects. However, prominent ethicists disagree over whether it is permissible for a woman's decision about abortion to be an inclusion or exclusion criterion for participation in research. A widely held view is that fetuses to be aborted and fetuses to be carried to term should be treated equally as research subjects. Some hold that this principle implies that a woman's decision about whether to have an abortion should not be an inclusion or exclusion criterion. This paper identifies types of research in which investigators might want to have inclusion or exclusion criteria based on decisions about abortion. It examines the arguments for and against having the woman's decision about abortion included in such criteria. It is argued that there are types of research in which such criteria are ethically permissible.
- research ethics
- prenatal research
- in utero gene transfer
- gene therapy/transfer
- embryos and fetuses
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Funding Research for this paper was supported by grant number R03HG005225 from the National Human Genome Research Institute. The content of this paper is solely the responsibility of the author and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Human Genome Research Institute or the National Institutes of Health. National Human Genome Research Institute, 9000 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA Other Funders: NIH.
Competing interests None.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Sham neurosurgery in patients with Parkinson's disease: is it morally acceptable?
- Effect of maternal origin on the association between maternal height and risk of preterm birth in Belgium: a retrospective observational cohort study
- Therapeutic optimism in the consent forms of phase 1 gene transfer trials: an empirical analysis
- Systematic review and metasummary of attitudes toward research in emergency medical conditions
- Characterising the gut microbiome in veterans with Gulf War Illness: a protocol for a longitudinal, prospective cohort study
- Towards PErsonalised PRognosis for children with traumatic brain injury: the PEPR study protocol
- Unilateral transplantation of human primary fetal tissue in four patients with Huntington’s disease: NEST-UK safety report ISRCTN no 36485475
- Effectiveness of cervical pessary compared to cervical cerclage with or without vaginal progesterone for the prevention of preterm birth in women with twin pregnancies and a short cervix: study protocol for a two-by-two factorial randomised clinical trial
- Tests to predict imminent delivery in threatened preterm labour
- Term complications and subsequent risk of preterm birth: registry based study