You are here

Article Text

Article menu
Download PDFPDF
Commentary
Dissent about assent in paediatric research
  1. Dominic Wilkinson
  1. Correspondence to Dr Dominic Wilkinson, Robinson Institute, University of Adelaide, North Adelaide 5006, South Australia, Australia; dominic.wilkinson{at}adelaide.edu.au

http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2011-100242

Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    In an article published in the Archives of Disease in Childhood, paediatric intensivist Paul Baines criticises the conceptual and ethical basis for an assent requirement in paediatric research.1 Existing international research guidelines stipulate that children who cannot competently consent to research should ‘assent’ to their participation. However, Baines finds existing descriptions of assent both inadequate and contradictory. The guidelines also fail to provide a clear rationale …

    View Full Text

    Footnotes

    • Competing interests None.

    • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.

    Linked Articles

    • Commentary
      Assent is not consent
      Amanda Sibley Mark Sheehan Andrew J Pollard
      Journal of Medical Ethics 2011; 38 3-3 Published Online First: 14 Dec 2011. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2011-100317

    Other content recommended for you