Article info
PDFLaw, ethics and medicine
Paper
When should conscientious objection be accepted?
- Correspondence to Morten Magelssen, Senter for Medisinsk Etikk, Universitetet i Oslo, 1130 Blindern, N-0318 Oslo, Norway; magelssen{at}gmail.com
Citation
When should conscientious objection be accepted?
Publication history
- Received March 4, 2011
- Revised May 3, 2011
- Accepted May 24, 2011
- First published June 20, 2011.
Online issue publication
February 23, 2018
Article Versions
- Previous version (27 April 2016).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© 2011, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
Other content recommended for you
- Public reason and the limited right to conscientious objection: a response to Magelssen
- Voluntarily chosen roles and conscientious objection in health care
- Professional and conscience-based refusals: the case of the psychiatrist's harmful prescription
- Conscientious objection in healthcare, referral and the military analogy
- Conscientious objection in healthcare: why tribunals might be the answer
- Conscientious objection and the referral requirement as morally permissible moral mistakes
- Conscientious objection in healthcare and the duty to refer
- Non-accommodationism and conscientious objection in healthcare: a response to Robinson
- Selling conscience short: a response to Schuklenk and Smalling on conscientious objections by medical professionals
- Questionable benefits and unavoidable personal beliefs: defending conscientious objection for abortion