Article info
The concise argument
Highlights from this issue
Citation
Highlights from this issue
Publication history
- First published December 14, 2011.
Online issue publication
December 14, 2011
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© 2011, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
Other content recommended for you
- The truth behind conscientious objection in medicine
- Conscientious objection in medical students: a questionnaire survey
- When should conscientious objection be accepted?
- Public reason and the limited right to conscientious objection: a response to Magelssen
- Conscientious objection and moral distress: a relational ethics case study of MAiD in Canada
- Professional and conscience-based refusals: the case of the psychiatrist's harmful prescription
- Is there no alternative? Conscientious objection by medical students
- Conscientious objection and its social context
- Ethical position of medical practitioners who refuse to treat unvaccinated children
- Some doubts about in vitro eugenics as a human enhancement technology