Human dignity has long been used as a foundational principle in policy documents and ethical guidelines intended to govern various forms of biomedical research. Despite the vast amount of literature concerning human dignity and embryonic tissues, the majority of biomedical research uses non-embryonic human tissue. Therefore, this contribution addresses a notable lacuna in the literature: the relationship, if any, between human dignity and human tissue. This paper first elaborates a multidimensional understanding of human dignity that overcomes many of the shortcomings associated with the use of human dignity in other ethical debates. Second, it discusses the relationship between such an understanding of human dignity and ‘non-embryonic’ human tissue. Finally, it considers the implications of this relationship for biomedical research and practice involving human tissue. The contribution demonstrates that while human tissue cannot be said to have human dignity, human dignity is nevertheless implicated by human tissue, making what is done with human tissue and how it is done worthy of moral consideration.
- Biomedical research
- donation/procurement of organs/tissues
- human dignity
- moral and religious aspects
- quality/value of life/personhood
- scientific research
- stem cell research
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Funding The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support of the European Commission under the DISC REGENERATION project (NMP3-LA-2008-213904).
Competing interests None.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Whose dignity? Resolving ambiguities in the scope of “human dignity” in the Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights
- What moral work can Nussbaum’s account of human dignity do in the context of dementia care?
- Ethical rhetoric: genomics and the moral content of UNESCO’s “universal” declarations
- Clarifying the best interests standard: the elaborative and enumerative strategies in public policy-making
- Making sense of dignity
- The moral value of induced pluripotent stem cells: a Japanese bioethics perspective on human embryo research
- Dignity: not such a useless concept
- Dignitarian medical ethics
- Dignity is a useless concept
- A resource-based version of the argument that cloning is an affront to human dignity