Article info
PDFLaw, ethics and medicine
Paper
Rethinking paternalism: an exploration of responses to the Israel Patient's Rights Act 1996
- Correspondence to Simon Waltho, 6 Wildoaks, Acacia Road, Staines, Middlesex TW18 1BY, UK; walthos1{at}cardiff.ac.uk
Citation
Rethinking paternalism: an exploration of responses to the Israel Patient's Rights Act 1996
Publication history
- Received December 23, 2010
- Revised February 8, 2011
- Accepted March 2, 2011
- First published March 30, 2011.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Article Versions
- Previous version (27 April 2016).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© 2011, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
Other content recommended for you
- Family presence during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: who should decide?
- Respect for autonomy: deciding what is good for oneself
- Ulysses Contracts in psychiatric care: helping patients to protect themselves from spiralling
- Coercion in psychiatry: is it right to involuntarily treat inpatients with capacity?
- Framing tobacco control efforts within an ethical context
- Neonatal euthanasia: moral considerations and criminal liability
- Defending the four principles approach as a good basis for good medical practice and therefore for good medical ethics
- Advance directives in psychiatric care: a narrative approach
- How should doctors approach patients? A Confucian reflection on personhood
- Treating competent patients by force: the limits and lessons of Israel’s Patient’s Rights Act