Article info
PDFFeature article
Paper
Just health: on the conditions for acceptable and unacceptable priority settings with respect to patients' socioeconomic status
- Correspondence to Kristine Bærøe, The Ethics Programme, University of Oslo, IFIKK, Postboks 1020 Blindern, Oslo 0315, Norway; kristine.baroe{at}ifikk.uio.no
Citation
Just health: on the conditions for acceptable and unacceptable priority settings with respect to patients' socioeconomic status
Publication history
- Received December 22, 2010
- Revised February 17, 2011
- Accepted March 2, 2011
- First published April 8, 2011.
Online issue publication
August 19, 2011
Article Versions
- Previous version (8 April 2011).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© 2011, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
Other content recommended for you
- Priority - setting in healthcare: a framework for reasonable clinical judgements
- The right to treatment for self-inflicted conditions
- Newborn health benefits or financial risk protection? An ethical analysis of a real - life dilemma in a setting without universal health coverage
- Estimating the economic costs of ethnic health inequities: protocol for a prevalence - based cost - of - illness study in New Zealand (2003–2014)
- Just health: replies and further thoughts
- Priority setting and personal health responsibility: an analysis of Norwegian key policy documents
- Defining equity in health
- The use of cost - effectiveness by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE): no (t yet an) exemplar of a deliberative process
- How French general practitioners adapt their care to patients with social difficulties
- A new typology of policies to tackle health inequalities and scenarios of impact based on Rose 's population approach