Responses

Download PDFPDF
Paper
Patients' perspectives of the substitute decision maker: who makes better decisions?
Compose Response

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests

PLEASE NOTE:

  • Responses are moderated before posting and publication is at the absolute discretion of BMJ, however they are not peer-reviewed
  • Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. Removal or editing of responses is at BMJ's absolute discretion
  • If patients could recognise themselves, or anyone else could recognise a patient from your description, please obtain the patient's written consent to publication and send them to the editorial office before submitting your response [Patient consent forms]
  • By submitting this response you are agreeing to our full [Response terms and requirements]

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

Jump to comment:

  • Published on:
    Substitute decision making - An ethical dilemma

    Dear Editor,

    I laud authors for attempting to understand the substitute decision making. The study may probably not be conclusive but, one can understand the differences between the patient's substitute decision maker to that of others. Respect for patient's autonomy is considered to be the fundamental principle in medical ethics, where competent patient has a right to accept or reject medical intervention. However, t...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.