Article Text
Abstract
Objectives The objective of this research was to develop ethics accreditation standards for hospitals.
Research design Our research methods included a literature review, an expert focus group, the Delphi technique and a hospital survey. The entire process was separated into two stages: (1) the development of a draft of hospital ethics accreditation standards; and (2) conducting a nationwide hospital survey of the proposed standards.
Results This study produced a tentative draft of hospital ethics accreditation standards comprised of six chapters and 62 standards based on the expert focus group and Delphi technique. The six chapters are: Medical ethics policies, regulations and leadership; The establishment and operation of a medical ethics committee; The establishment and operation of research-related ethics committees; Medical ethics education; Organisational ethical climate; and Respect for patients' rights and establishment of good hospital-patient relationships. The hospital survey indicated that the concept of an organisational ethical climate was new to most hospital managers, most hospitals disliked the idea of having a separate hospital ethics accreditation system, and small hospitals were concerned about their ability to comply with all of the standards.
Conclusions Regardless of whether hospital ethics accreditation can be a stand-alone accreditation or just part of existing hospital accreditation programmes, we hope this draft can serve as a good reference for future endeavours by hospital accreditation authorities.
- Medical ethics
- organisational ethics
- ethical climate
- accreditation
- applied and professional ethics
- general
- quality of healthcare
- legal aspects
- interests of health personnel/institutions
- applied and professional ethics
- general
- quality of health care
- legal aspects
- interests of health personnel/institutions
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Funding The authors would like to acknowledge the research grant (DOH96-TD-M-113-047) funded by the Department of Health, Taiwan (ROC).
Competing interests None.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Clinical ethicists’ perspectives on organisational ethics in healthcare organisations
- Effects of ethical climate in association with tenure on work addiction, quality of care and staff retention: a cross-sectional study
- ‘Not another safety culture survey’: using the Canadian patient safety climate survey (Can-PSCS) to measure provider perceptions of PSC across health settings
- Reference to nutrition in medical accreditation and curriculum guidance: a comparative analysis
- Ethical climate in contemporary paediatric intensive care
- The NHS and market forces in healthcare: the need for organisational ethics
- Health service accreditation as a predictor of clinical and organisational performance: a blinded, random, stratified study
- Understanding ethical climate, moral distress, and burnout: a novel tool and a conceptual framework
- A questionnaire survey exploring healthcare professionals’ attitudes towards teamwork and safety in acute care areas in South Korea
- Paradoxes of French accreditation