Background Population based genetics studies are dependent on large numbers of individuals in the pursuit of small effect sizes. Recruiting and consenting a large number of participants is both costly and time consuming. We explored whether an online consent process for large-scale genetics studies is acceptable for prospective participants using an example online genetics study.
Methods We conducted semi-structured interviews with 42 members of the public stratified by age group, gender and newspaper readership (a measure of social status). Respondents were asked to use a website designed to recruit for a large-scale genetic study. After using the website a semi-structured interview was conducted to explore opinions and any issues they would have. Responses were analysed using thematic content analysis.
Results The majority of respondents said they would take part in the research (32/42). Those who said they would decline to participate saw fewer benefits from the research, wanted more information and expressed a greater number of concerns about the study. Younger respondents had concerns over time commitment. Middle aged respondents were concerned about privacy and security. Older respondents were more altruistic in their motivation to participate. Common themes included trust in the authenticity of the website, security of personal data, curiosity about their own genetic profile, operational concerns and a desire for more information about the research.
Conclusions Online consent to large-scale genetic studies is likely to be acceptable to the public. The online consent process must establish trust quickly and effectively by asserting authenticity and credentials, and provide access to a range of information to suit different information preferences.
- informed consent
- on-line systems
- qualitative research
- informed consent
- genetic screening/testing
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Funding This study was funded by the National Epidemiology Wales Project Grant from the Welsh Assembly Government.
Competing interests None.
Ethics approval This study was conducted with the approval of the Cardiff University Medical and Dental Schools Ethics Committee.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Effect of ethnicity, gender and drug use history on achieving high rates of affirmative informed consent for genetics research: impact of sharing with a national repository
- Informed consent, participation in, and withdrawal from a population based cohort study involving genetic analysis
- Issues of consent and feedback in a genetic epidemiological study of women with breast cancer
- Ethical aspects of research into Alzheimer disease. A European Delphi Study focused on genetic and non-genetic research
- Genetic research on rare familial disorders: consent and the blurred boundaries between clinical service and research
- Safeguards for research using large scale DNA collections
- Collecting genetic samples and linked mental health data from adolescents in schools: protocol coproduction and a mixed-methods pilot of feasibility and acceptability
- Biobanks and the importance of detailed phenotyping: a case study—the European Glaucoma Society GlaucoGENE project
- Genetic susceptibility to the respiratory effects of air pollution
- Researchers’ preferences and attitudes on ethical aspects of genomics research: a comparative study between the USA and Spain