Article info
PDFClinical ethics
Paper
Women's views on the moral status of nature in the context of prenatal screening decisions
- Correspondence to Elisa García, Department of Ethics, Philosophy and History of Medicine, University Medical Center St Radboud, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands; e.garciagonzalez{at}iq.umcn.nl
Citation
Women's views on the moral status of nature in the context of prenatal screening decisions
Publication history
- Received October 1, 2010
- Revised February 3, 2011
- Accepted February 6, 2011
- First published March 23, 2011.
Online issue publication
February 11, 2017
Article Versions
- Previous version (27 April 2016).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© 2011, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
Other content recommended for you
- Reconsidering prenatal screening: an empirical–ethical approach to understand moral dilemmas as a question of personal preferences
- Hostile environments? Down’s syndrome and genetic screening in contemporary culture
- Terminating pregnancy after prenatal diagnosis—with a little help of professional ethics?
- Parental duties and untreatable genetic conditions
- After-birth abortion: why should the baby live?
- Consumerism in prenatal diagnosis: a challenge for ethical guidelines
- Ethics of using preimplantation genetic diagnosis to select a stem cell donor for an existing person
- With new prenatal testing, will babies with Down syndrome slowly disappear?
- Trisomy 21 in both fetuses in a DCDA twin pregnancy
- Should pregnant women be charged for non-invasive prenatal screening? Implications for reproductive autonomy and equal access