The rule of double effect is regularly invoked in ethical discussions about palliative sedation, terminal extubation and other clinical acts that may be viewed as hastening death for imminently dying patients. Unfortunately, the literature tends to employ this useful principle in a fashion suggesting that it offers the final word on the moral acceptability of such medical procedures. In fact, the rule cannot be applied appropriately without invoking moral theories that are not explicit in the rule itself. Four tenets of the rule each require their own ethical justification. A variety of moral theories are relevant to making judgements in a pluralistic society. Much of the rich moral conversation germane to the rule has been reflected in arguments about physician-asssisted suicide and voluntary active euthanasia, but the rule itself has limited relevance to these debates, and requires its own moral justifications when applied to other practices that might hasten death.
- Double effect principle
- palliative sedation
- hastening death
- palliative care
- education for healthcare professionals
- ethics committees/consultation
- moral and religious aspects
- care of the dying patient
- prolongation of life and euthanasia
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Does the doctrine of double effect apply to the prescription of barbiturates? Syme vs the Medical Board of Australia
- Weakening the ethical distinction between euthanasia, palliative opioid use and palliative sedation
- Can facilitated aid in dying be permitted by ‘double effect’? Some reflections from a recent New Zealand case
- Euthanasia, efficiency, and the historical distinction between killing a patient and allowing a patient to die
- Terminal sedation and the “imminence condition”
- The role of the principle of double effect in ethics education at US medical schools and its potential impact on pain management at the end of life
- Response to Ronald M Perkin and David B Resnik: The agony of trying to match sanctity of life and patient-centred medical care
- Internists’ attitudes towards terminal sedation in end of life care
- Ethical end-of-life palliative care: response to Riisfeldt
- Expanded terminal sedation in end-of-life care