Article Text
Abstract
In contemporary medicine, it is not always obvious whether the acceptance of a benefit constitutes a conflict of interest. A particular area of controversy has been the impact of small gifts or other benefits from pharmaceutical companies on physicians' behaviour. Typically, in such cases, the gift is not an explicit reward for cooperation; the physician does not perceive the gift as an attempt to influence his or her judgement; and the reward is relatively minor. Under these circumstances, physicians are generally of the view that acceptance of gifts will not affect their behaviour, notwithstanding findings from social psychology and neuroscience that the impact of gifts is often unconscious, shaping action without a person's awareness. Here, we draw on traditional texts of Jewish law pertaining to the prohibition of taking a gift to illustrate recognition by the ancients of unconscious conflicts of interest, and their approach to dealing with the problem.
- Conflict of interest
- professional ethics
- Jewish ethics
- applied and professional ethics
- religious ethics
- codes of/position statements on professional ethics
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Undisclosed financial conflicts of interest in DSM-5-TR: cross sectional analysis
- Who is paying your doctor?
- EBM: unmasking the ugly truth
- Biomedical conflicts of interest: a defence of the sequestration thesis—learning from the cases of Nancy Olivieri and David Healy
- Conflicts of interest are harming maternal and child health: time for scientific journals to end relationships with manufacturers of breast-milk substitutes
- Association between industry affiliation and position on cardiovascular risk with rosiglitazone: cross sectional systematic review
- Industry funding of patient and health consumer organisations: systematic review with meta-analysis
- Legislative, educational, policy and other interventions targeting physicians’ interaction with pharmaceutical companies: a systematic review
- Justifying conflicts of interest in medical journals: a very bad idea
- Conflicts of interest and neurointerventional surgery