Article info
PDFResponse
Strong's objections to the future of value account
- Correspondence to Professor Don Marquis, Department of Philosophy, The University of Kansas, 1445 Jayhawk Blvd, rm 3090, Lawrence, Kansas-66045, USA; dmarquis{at}ku.edu
Citation
Strong's objections to the future of value account
Publication history
- Received July 27, 2010
- Revised November 16, 2010
- Accepted December 10, 2010
- First published February 18, 2011.
Online issue publication
May 23, 2011
Article Versions
- Previous version (18 February 2011).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© 2011, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
Other content recommended for you
- Reply to Marquis: how things stand with the ‘future like ours’ argument
- Savulescu’s objections to the future of value argument
- Deprivations, futures and the wrongness of killing
- Reply to Di Nucci: why the counterexamples succeed
- Abortion and human nature
- Abortion: Strong’s counterexamples fail
- A future like ours revisited
- A critique of “the best secular argument against abortion”
- A defence of the potential future of value theory
- On how to interpret the role of the future within the abortion debate