Empathy is commonly regarded as an essential attribute for doctors and there is a conviction that empathy must be taught to medical students. Yet it is not clear exactly what empathy is, from a philosophical or sociological point of view, or whether it can be taught. The meaning, role and relevance of empathy in medical education have tended to be unquestioningly assumed; there is a need to examine and contextualise these assumptions. This paper opens up that debate, arguing that ‘empathy’, as it is commonly understood, is neither necessary nor sufficient to guarantee good medical or ethical practice.
- communication skills, philosophical ethics
- philosophy of the health professions
- quality of health care
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Competing interests None.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Practical virtue ethics: healthcare whistleblowing and portable digital technology
- Written role models in professionalism education
- The production of medicoethical misconduct: medical ethics and vivisection in Wilkie Collins’s Heart and Science
- Empathy and affect: what can empathied bodies do?
- The death of Hector: pity in Homer, empathy in medical education
- Suffering, compassion and ‘doing good medical ethics’
- Whistleblowing in medicine and in Homer's Iliad
- Narrative in medical ethics
- Attributes of a good physician: what are the opinions of first-year medical students?
- Telling the Patient's Story: using theatre training to improve case presentation skills