Objective To study parental attitudes to participating in questionnaire research about perinatal postmortem immediately after late miscarriage, stillbirth and termination for fetal abnormality.
Design Prospective self-completion questionnaire.
Setting UK fetal medicine and delivery unit.
Patients 35 women and their partners after second or third trimester pregnancy loss, making decisions about having a postmortem.
Methods Participants were asked to complete a questionnaire about postmortem decision-making which included questions about their attitudes to taking part in research. Prior to giving full approval for the study, the Research Ethics Committee (REC) requested feedback after 10 questionnaires had been returned.
Results Responses from the first 10 participants were positive about the research and the REC allowed the study to continue. 31 questionnaires were received from parents of 17 babies (49% of those asked; 16 from mothers, 15 from fathers). Of the 22 participants who answered a question about the impact of participating in this research, 73% stated that completing the questionnaire had helped them feel better about the decision whether or not to consent to postmortem and none reported any adverse effect of completing the questionnaire. Additional comments made by 19 participants supported this finding.
Conclusion Research into this sensitive area of perinatal medicine where there is a poor outcome is possible and is indeed well received by many parents. RECs should not automatically take a negative stance towards studies of this type.
- fetal death
- research ethics
- ethics committees/consultation
- informed consent
- policy guidelines/inst. review boards/review cttes
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Funding ACGB's salary was in part funded by Cambridge Fetal Care.
Competing interests None.
Ethics approval This study was conducted with the approval of the Cambridge 3 REC on 28th January 2005 04/Q0108/185.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Perinatal pathology in the context of a clinical trial: a review of the literature
- PARENTS 2 Study: a qualitative study of the views of healthcare professionals and stakeholders on parental engagement in the perinatal mortality review—from ‘bottom of the pile’ to joint learning
- Cross sectional survey of parents' experience and views of the postmortem examination
- Perinatal pathology in the context of a clinical trial: attitudes of bereaved parents
- Prospective parental consent for autopsy research following sudden unexpected childhood deaths: a successful model
- Neonatal and perinatal palliative care pathway: a tertiary neonatal unit approach
- Health professionals’ and coroners’ views on less invasive perinatal and paediatric autopsy: a qualitative study
- Diagnostic accuracy of perinatal post-mortem ultrasound (PMUS): a systematic review
- Non-equivalent stringency of ethical review in the Baltic States: a sign of a systematic problem in Europe?
- Doing challenging research studies in a patient-centred way: a qualitative study to inform a randomised controlled trial in the paediatric emergency care setting