Article metrics
PDF
Other content recommended for you
- Priority setting and personal health responsibility: an analysis of Norwegian key policy documents
- The right to treatment for self-inflicted conditions
- Personal responsibility for health as a rationing criterion: why we don’t like it and why maybe we should
- Just health responsibility
- Lifestyle, responsibility and justice
- Between professional values, social regulations and patient preferences: medical doctors’ perceptions of ethical dilemmas
- ‘There is a lot of good in knowing, but there is also a lot of downs’: public views on ethical considerations in population genomic screening
- Prevention in the age of personal responsibility: epigenetic risk-predictive screening for female cancers as a case study
- Against tiebreaking arguments in priority setting
- Does accountability for reasonableness work? A protocol for a mixed methods study using an audit tool to evaluate the decision-making of clinical commissioning groups in England