Article Text
Abstract
Researchers should be made co-responsible for the wider consequences of their research focus and the application of their findings. This paper describes a meta-reflection procedure that can be used as a tool to enhance scientific responsibility and reflective practice. The point of departure is that scientific practice is situated in power relations, has direction and, consequently, power implications. The contextual preconditions and implications of research should be stated and discussed openly. The reflection method aims at revealing both upstream elements, such as for instance preconceptions, and downstream elements, for example, public consequences of research. The validity of research might improve from such discussions. Validity should preferably be understood as a broader concept than the methodological concerns in science.
- Education/programmes
- ethical dilemmas
- ethics
- philosophy of medicine
- research
- scientific research
- social control of science/technology
- social responsibility
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Competing interests None.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Other content recommended for you
- Homo immunologicus: on the limits of critique
- What is nature capable of? Evidence, ontology and speculative medical humanities
- ‘Living in a Material World’: Frankenstein and new materialism
- Essential(ist) medicine: promoting social explanations for racial variation in biomedical research
- Global genetic fictions
- Subjective judgements in scientific practice and art
- Philosophy for medical students—why, what, and how
- Animal research nexus: a new approach to the connections between science, health and animal welfare
- Protocol for a qualitative study of knowledge translation in a participatory research project
- Thinking with the living body: the biopsychosocial model and the cosmopolitics of existence