Article Text
Abstract
The advent of prenatal genetic diagnosis has sparked debates among ethicists and philosophers regarding parental responsibility towards potential offspring. Some have attempted to place moral obligations on parents to not bring about children with certain diseases in order to prevent harm to such children. There has been no rigorous evaluation of cystic fibrosis in this context. This paper will demonstrate cystic fibrosis to have unique properties that make it difficult to categorise among other diseases with the goal of promulgating a reproductive rule. Once this is established, it will be demonstrated that procreative rules that appeal to future health are inadequate in the era of advancing genetic knowledge. Utilising a specification of Joel Feinberg's ‘open future’ concept outlined by Matteo Mameli, it will offer an analysis of parental obligation that does not constrain parents of potential children with cystic fibrosis with a moral obligation not to bring them about.
- Cystic fibrosis
- ethics
- failure of contraception/wrongful birth
- health care for specific diseases/groups
- human genome project
- moral obligations
- prenatal genetic diagnosis
- quality/value of life/personhood
- psychopharmacology
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Competing interests None.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Linked Articles
- The concise argument
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Willing mothers: ectogenesis and the role of gestational motherhood
- Sex selection for social purposes in Israel: quest for the “perfect child” of a particular gender or centuries old prejudice against women?
- Parental obligation and compelled caesarean section: careful analogies and reliable reasoning about individual cases
- The right not to know and preimplantation genetic diagnosis for Huntington’s disease
- Fetuses, newborns, & parental responsibility
- Interpretations, perspectives and intentions in surrogate motherhood
- Does egg donation for mitochondrial replacement techniques generate parental responsibilities?
- A little bit pregnant: towards a pluralist account of non-sexual reproduction
- Parental duties and untreatable genetic conditions
- Reproductive cloning, genetic engineering and the autonomy of the child: the moral agent and the open future