There is currently an unrecognised conflict between the utilitarian nature of the overall NHS and the basic deontology of the doctor-patient interaction. This conflict leads to mistrust and misunderstanding between managers and clinicians. This misunderstanding is bad for both doctors and managers, and also leads to waste of time and resources, and poorer services to patients. The utilitarian thinkers (mainly managers and politicians) tend to value finite, short term, evidence based technical interventions, delivered according to specifications and contracts. They appear happy to break care up into smaller pieces, which can then be commissioned from multiple providers. The deontological thinkers (mainly doctors and other clinicians) tend to think about care delivered through a long term continuous relationship, and regard that relationship as therapeutic and salutogenic in itself. To them breaking care up into smaller fragments is a denial of what caring is really about. Very rarely are either or both sides of this debate fully aware of where their powerfully felt and often well argued positions start from. In this paper we offer an appraisal of the strengths and weaknesses of both moral viewpoints as applied in the UK NHS context and we suggest a way in which they can be reconciled, provided neither is pushed too far or too hard against the other. We believe this reconciliation would be good for patients, doctors, managers and improve the service as a whole.
- Healthcare economics
- managed care
- philosophy of medicine
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Competing interests None.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Should physicians be gatekeepers of medical resources?
- Moral dimensions
- Ethical issues in funding orphan drug research and development
- Imperfect by design: the problematic ethics of surgical training
- Fidelity to the healing relationship: a medical student's challenge to contemporary bioethics and prescription for medical practice
- Different approach to medical decision-making in difficult circumstances: Kittay’s Ethics of Care
- From protection to entitlement: selecting research subjects for early phase clinical trials involving breakthrough therapies
- COVID-19 and the orthopaedic surgeon: who gets redeployed?
- National health system cuts and triage decisions during the COVID-19 pandemic in Italy and Spain: ethical implications
- Challenges in the provision of ICU services to HIV infected children in resource poor settings: a South African case study