Article info
The concise argument
Highlights from this issue
Citation
Highlights from this issue
Publication history
- First published April 20, 2011.
Online issue publication
April 20, 2011
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© 2011, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
Other content recommended for you
- Veterinary surgeons' attitudes towards physician-assisted suicide: an empirical study of Swedish experts on euthanasia
- When is physician assisted suicide or euthanasia acceptable?
- Young Kuwaitis' views of the acceptability of physician-assisted suicide
- Health professionals generally have more restrictive attitudes towards assisted dying in dementia than the public
- French hospital nurses’ opinion about euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide: a national phone survey
- The case for physician assisted suicide: how can it possibly be proven?
- Legal physician-assisted dying in Oregon and the Netherlands: evidence concerning the impact on patients in “vulnerable” groups
- The role of advance euthanasia directives as an aid to communication and shared decision-making in dementia
- The role of nurses in euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide in The Netherlands
- The case for physician assisted suicide: not (yet) proven