Article Text
PDF
Wainwright and Gallagher propose that when child protection concerns emerge significant difficulties arise for General Practitioners because of conflicts between the individual interests of children and parents who are their patients and the Paramountcy Principle. From a psychodynamic perspective their analysis does not give sufficient weight to the nature of personal as opposed to interpersonal conflict of a conscious or unconscious nature. When issues of major import arise, ordinary parenting inevitably involves parents in putting their children's needs first if competing possibilities occur. It is an over-simplification to present this as a conflict between the interests of children and parents. Parents' own best interests are served by securing their children's safety and welfare. An appreciation of this is crucial in order to implement child protection procedures appropriately. Errors may occur because the complex emotions and relationships involved lead professionals to experience themselves as potential agents of harm rather than benefit.
- Applied and professional ethics
- quality/value of life/personhood
- minors/parental consent
- interests of health personnel/institutions
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Wainwright and Gallagher propose that when child protection concerns emerge significant difficulties arise for General Practitioners because of conflicts between the individual interests of children and parents who are their patients and the Paramountcy Principle. From a psychodynamic perspective their analysis does not give sufficient weight to the nature of personal as opposed to interpersonal conflict of a conscious or unconscious nature. When issues of major import arise, ordinary parenting inevitably involves parents in putting their children's needs first if competing possibilities occur. It is an over-simplification to present this as a conflict between the interests of children and parents. Parents' own best interests are served by securing their children's safety and welfare. An appreciation of this is crucial in order to implement child protection procedures appropriately. Errors may occur because the complex emotions and relationships involved lead professionals to experience themselves as potential agents of harm rather than benefit.
Footnotes
Competing interests None.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Understanding general practitioners' conflicts of interests and the paramountcy principle in safeguarding children
- Findings from a Delphi exercise regarding conflicts of interests, general practitioners and safeguarding children: ‘Listen carefully, judge slowly’
- Child protection procedures in emergency departments
- Is age the limit for human-assisted reproduction techniques? ‘Yes’, said an Italian judge
- Fits, faints, or fatal fantasy? Fabricated seizures and child abuse
- Child abuse and its legislation: the global picture
- Interventions to promote the health and well-being of children under 5s experiencing homelessness in high-income countries: a scoping review
- Role of pre-existing adversity and child maltreatment on mental health outcomes for children involved in child protection: population-based data linkage study
- Assessment of whole school approach intervention to reduce violence affecting children in and around schools in Kenya and Tanzania: protocol for a before-and-after, mixed-methods pilot study
- Safeguarding essentials in modern-day paediatrics: inflicted injuries, body maps and section 47 investigations