Article Text
Ethics
Paper
Sexual rights and disability
Abstract
This paper argues against Appel's recent proposal—in this journal—that there is a fundamental human right to sexual pleasure, and that therefore the sexual pleasure of severely disabled people should be publicly funded—by thereby partially legalising prostitution. An alternative is proposed that does not need to pose a new positive human right; does not need public funding; does not need the legalisation of prostitution; and that would offer a better experience to the severely disabled: charitable non-profit organisations whose members would voluntarily and freely provide sexual pleasure to the severely disabled.
- Mentally disabled persons
- philosophical ethics
- sexuality/gender
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Whither a Welfare-Funded ’Sex Doula' Programme?
- Disability, sex rights and the scope of sexual exclusion
- A human right to pleasure? Sexuality, autonomy and egalitarian strategies
- Prostitution, disability and prohibition
- Positive rights, negative rights and health care
- Sex rights for the disabled?
- Reproduction misconceived: why there is no right to reproduce and the implications for ART access
- Human rights and bioethics
- Health professionals and human rights campaigners: different cultures, shared goals
- Our right to in vitro fertilisation—its scope and limits