Article info
PDFClinical ethics
Paper
Ethical review reporting of Chinese trials records in WHO primary registries
- Correspondence to Dr Li Youping, Chinese Evidence-Based Medicine Center, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China; yzmylab{at}hotmail.com
Citation
Ethical review reporting of Chinese trials records in WHO primary registries
Publication history
- Received March 9, 2010
- Revised September 22, 2010
- Accepted October 4, 2010
- First published November 25, 2010.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Article Versions
- Previous version (27 April 2016).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© 2011, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
Other content recommended for you
- Quality assessment of clinical trial registration with traditional Chinese medicine in WHO registries
- Trends in global clinical trial registration: an analysis of numbers of registered clinical trials in different parts of the world from 2004 to 2013
- Prospective registration and reporting of trial number in randomised clinical trials: global cross sectional study of the adoption of ICMJE and Declaration of Helsinki recommendations
- Pharmacokinetic research in children: an analysis of registered records of clinical trials
- Telehealth versus self-directed lifestyle intervention to promote healthy blood pressure: a protocol for a randomised controlled trial
- Clinical trial transparency in the Americas: the need to coordinate regulatory spheres
- Assessment of women’s sexual quality of life after benign adnexal surgery using vNOTES approach in comparison to conventional laparoscopy: protocol for a randomised controlled trial
- From registration, protocol to report: are COVID-19-related RCTs in mainland China consistent? A systematic review of clinical trial registry and literature
- Characteristics and publication fate of unregistered and retrospectively registered clinical trials submitted to The BMJ over 4 years
- Comparative efficacy and tolerability of pharmacological interventions for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in children, adolescents and adults: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis