The human enhancement debate typically centres on moral issues regarding changes in human nature, not on the means for these changes. We argue that one cannot grasp what is morally salient about human enhancement without understanding how technologies affect human action and practical reasoning. We present a minimalist conception of human agents as bounded practical reasoners. Then, we categorise different effects of technologies on our possibilities for action and our evaluation of these possibilities. For each, we discuss whether enhancement technologies have morally salient effects; which technologies show these effects; and whether these differ significantly from those of other, non-enhancement technologies. We conclude that enhancement technologies are morally salient in several respects, that not all enhancement technologies share all those morally salient respects, and that continuities with traditional technologies may be found in all morally salient respects.
- philosophical ethics
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Human enhancement and perfection
- Should we enhance animals?
- Transhumanism, medical technology and slippery slopes
- What are we to make of the charge that human biological enhancement technologies are ‘unnatural’?
- The perils of failing to enhance: a response to Persson and Savulescu
- Enhancement, ethics and society: towards an empirical research agenda for the medical humanities and social sciences
- Moral reasons to edit the human genome: picking up from the Nuffield report
- The inference from a single case: moral versus scientific inferences in implementing new biotechnologies
- Reply to commentators on Unfit for the Future
- Defending human enhancement technologies: unveiling normativity