It has recently been suggested by Shaw (2007) that the distinction between voluntary active euthanasia, such as giving a patient a lethal overdose with the intention of ending that patient's life, and voluntary passive euthanasia, such as removing a patient from a ventilator, is much less obvious than is commonly acknowledged in the literature. This is argued by suggesting a new perspective that more accurately reflects the moral features of end-of-life situations. The argument is simply that if we consider the body of a mentally competent patient who wants to die, a kind of ‘unwarranted’ life support, then the distinction collapses. We argue that all Shaw has provided is a perspective that makes the conclusion that there is little distinction between voluntary active euthanasia and voluntary passive euthanasia only seemingly more palatable. In doing so he has yet to convince us that this perspective is superior to other perspectives and thus more accurately reflects the moral features of the situations pertaining to this issue.
- Voluntary euthanasia
- passive euthanasia
- end-of-life decisions
- quality/value of life/personhood
- right to refuse treatment
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Competing interests None.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Assisted suicide and the killing of people? Maybe. Physician-assisted suicide and the killing of patients? No: the rejection of Shaw's new perspective on euthanasia
- A case for justified non-voluntary active euthanasia: exploring the ethics of the Groningen Protocol
- A defence of a new perspective on euthanasia
- The body as unwarranted life support: a new perspective on euthanasia
- Passive euthanasia
- Causal authorship and the equality principle: a defence of the acts/omissions distinction in euthanasia
- Neonatal euthanasia: moral considerations and criminal liability
- Moral duties and euthanasia: why to kill is not necessarily the same as to let die
- Attitudes towards euthanasia in Iran: the role of altruism
- Euthanasia, Ethics and Public Policy. An Argument Against Legislation