Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Life support and euthanasia, a perspective on Shaw's new perspective
  1. Jacob Busch,
  2. Raffaele Rodogno
  1. Department of Philosophy, University of Aarhus, Denmark
  1. Correspondence to Dr Jacob Busch, University of Aarhus, Jens Chr. Skous Vej 7, Aarhus 8000, Denmark; filjab{at}


It has recently been suggested by Shaw (2007) that the distinction between voluntary active euthanasia, such as giving a patient a lethal overdose with the intention of ending that patient's life, and voluntary passive euthanasia, such as removing a patient from a ventilator, is much less obvious than is commonly acknowledged in the literature. This is argued by suggesting a new perspective that more accurately reflects the moral features of end-of-life situations. The argument is simply that if we consider the body of a mentally competent patient who wants to die, a kind of ‘unwarranted’ life support, then the distinction collapses. We argue that all Shaw has provided is a perspective that makes the conclusion that there is little distinction between voluntary active euthanasia and voluntary passive euthanasia only seemingly more palatable. In doing so he has yet to convince us that this perspective is superior to other perspectives and thus more accurately reflects the moral features of the situations pertaining to this issue.

  • Voluntary euthanasia
  • passive euthanasia
  • personhood
  • end-of-life decisions
  • identity
  • quality/value of life/personhood
  • right to refuse treatment

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.


  • Competing interests None.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Linked Articles