Article info
PDFResearch ethics
Retractions in the scientific literature: do authors deliberately commit research fraud?
- Correspondence to R Grant Steen, Medical Communications Consultants LLC, 103 Van Doren Place, Chapel Hill, NC 27517, USA; g_steen_medicc{at}yahoo.com
Citation
Retractions in the scientific literature: do authors deliberately commit research fraud?
Publication history
- Received May 31, 2010
- Revised July 29, 2010
- Accepted August 13, 2010
- First published November 15, 2010.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© 2011, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
Other content recommended for you
- Retractions in the scientific literature: is the incidence of research fraud increasing?
- Why unethical papers should be retracted
- Retractions in the medical literature: how can patients be protected from risk?
- Scientific retractions and corrections related to misconduct findings
- Empirical developments in retraction
- Retracted papers originating from paper mills: cross sectional study
- Why articles are retracted: a retrospective cross-sectional study of retraction notices at BioMed Central
- Reasons for and time to retraction of genetics articles published between 1970 and 2018
- Retractions in the medical literature: how many patients are put at risk by flawed research?
- Misinformation in the medical literature: What role do error and fraud play?