Facebook activity of residents and fellows and its impact on the doctor–patient relationship

Ghassan Moubarak; Aurélie Guiot; Ygal Benhamou; Alexandra Benhamou; Sarah Hariri

doi:10.1136/jme.2010.036293

Responses

Global medical ethics

Facebook activity of residents and fellows and its impact on the doctor–patient relationship

Compose a Response to This Article

Compose Response

Title *

Author Information

Contributors
First Name and Middle Initial * First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'. Last Name * Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'. Email Address * Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com Occupation * Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'. Affiliation * Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.

Statement of Competing Interests

Competing interests? *

Yes

Please describe the competing interests

PLEASE NOTE:

A rapid response is a moderated but not peer reviewed online response to a published article in a BMJ journal; it will not receive a DOI and will not be indexed unless it is also republished as a Letter, Correspondence or as other content. Find out more about rapid responses.
We intend to post all responses which are approved by the Editor, within 14 days (BMJ Journals) or 24 hours (The BMJ), however timeframes cannot be guaranteed. Responses must comply with our requirements and should contribute substantially to the topic, but it is at our absolute discretion whether we publish a response, and we reserve the right to edit or remove responses before and after publication and also republish some or all in other BMJ publications, including third party local editions in other countries and languages
Our requirements are stated in our rapid response terms and conditions and must be read. These include ensuring that: i) you do not include any illustrative content including tables and graphs, ii) you do not include any information that includes specifics about any patients,iii) you do not include any original data, unless it has already been published in a peer reviewed journal and you have included a reference, iv) your response is lawful, not defamatory, original and accurate, v) you declare any competing interests, vi) you understand that your name and other personal details set out in our rapid response terms and conditions will be published with any responses we publish and vii) you understand that once a response is published, we may continue to publish your response and/or edit or remove it in the future.
By submitting this rapid response you are agreeing to our terms and conditions for rapid responses and understand that your personal data will be processed in accordance with those terms and our privacy notice.

I agree to and have read the terms and conditions for rapid responses and BMJ Privacy Notice *

CAPTCHA

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

Jump to comment:

A safe ground to take for facebook activity of residents and fellows
Bing H. Tang, M D, M P H
Published on: 18 May 2017
A bigger threat to patient privacy when doctors use Facebook
Stephen Wilson
Published on: 18 May 2017

Published on: 18 May 2017
A safe ground to take for facebook activity of residents and fellows
- Bing H. Tang, M D, M P H, Senior Researcher
A safe ground to take for facebook activity of residents and fellows
Bing H Tang, MD, MPH
Research & Ethics
Danville, California, U S
I read with interest Facebook activity of residents and fellows and its impact on the doctor-patient relationship (J Med Ethics jme.2010.036293Published Online First: 15 December 2010 doi:10.1136/jme).
Basically, facebook is a way of maki...
Show More

A safe ground to take for facebook activity of residents and fellows
Bing H Tang, MD, MPH
Research & Ethics
Danville, California, U S
I read with interest Facebook activity of residents and fellows and its impact on the doctor-patient relationship (J Med Ethics jme.2010.036293Published Online First: 15 December 2010 doi:10.1136/jme).
Basically, facebook is a way of making oneself known to another, and,in so doing, asking the other person to make him/herself known to you.
The "primitive" yet VERY personal Facebook method, one known to me since my boyhood in the Far East, is to offer my Calling card on which basic data about myself are contained, to the person I have just met. As I say my name, out of my pocket comes the little card on which my "face" is revealed: name, address, title, and all degrees I earned, telephone, telegram, and what not. The "primitive" is, as well, the very personal way. It appears to be inconvenient as following: on meeting a stranger, one does not have one's calling card handy and give it to the "stranger".
Facebook, today has expanded globally. It's the mechanized system of exchanging your personality and whatever else you want to add to the world. Once you are on Facebook, millions of people, potentially, can find you. The big question for someone, would be, "How much do you want to reveal.
Facebook, in fact, is YOU-dominated platform, therefore you decide what privacy you want to keep, as well, what you want to reveal.
If one doest not use it as a device to find friends, as well, not for playing games do not etc either, nor can I see any risk of using it.
If one uses the New high technique and also very cautious to keep reminding oneself to refrain from what not to be used, it will be little risk involved.
As to the question of whether or not Facebook is "ethical", I think "ethical" in this connection has little or nothing to do with Facebook.
If doctors only want to discuss a case, all personal information of this particular patient could be codified that nobody over the web can identify the patient's identity, and still achieve the objective of discussing a case. Doctors should know the risk over the web, and try to wear the patient's shoes on going facebook talking about his patient. Not do onto others that you don't like people do onto you, or even one more step further, do onto others that you wish people did onto you, as Christ taught.
References
[1] Wilson S, Johnston J, More trouble with Facebook. Privacy Law Bulletin 2010;7.2:25-8.
[2] Michael Zimmer blog, Facebook's Zuckerberg: "Having two identities for yourself is an example of a lack of integrity" 14 May 2010 http://michaelzimmer.org/2010/05/14/facebooks-zuckerberg-having-two- identities-for-yourself-is-an-example-of-a-lack-of-integrity.
[3] Facebook activity of residents and fellows and its impact on the doctor-patient relationship Ghassan Moubarak, Aur?lie Guiot, Ygal Benhamou, Alexandra Benhamou, Sarah Hariri J Med Ethics jme.2010.036293Published Online First: 15 December 2010 doi:10.1136/jme.2010.036293
Conflict of Interest:
None declared
Show Less

Conflict of Interest:
None declared.
- Back to top
Published on: 18 May 2017
A bigger threat to patient privacy when doctors use Facebook
- Stephen Wilson, Principal Consultant
Moubarak et al conclude that "Residents and fellows frequently use Facebook and display personal information on their profiles. Insufficient privacy protection might have an impact the doctor-patient relationship". I agree strongly; users of Online Social Networking sites clearly need to take care with their postings, and exercise the same sort of social graces, including inhibition, as we do in the real world.
...
Show More

Moubarak et al conclude that "Residents and fellows frequently use Facebook and display personal information on their profiles. Insufficient privacy protection might have an impact the doctor-patient relationship". I agree strongly; users of Online Social Networking sites clearly need to take care with their postings, and exercise the same sort of social graces, including inhibition, as we do in the real world.
Yet I caution that the medical profession should worry about more than incidental privacy breaches by doctors who might in effect simply 'forget where they are'. There are more serious systemic risks that can automatically identify select patients of doctors and make that information public.
The "find friends" feature of Facebook surreptitiously imports members' web mail address books in their entirety. The feature's overt purpose is to allow Facebook to find individuals that are common to pairs of people, so that those pairs can be suggested as potential friends. The "find friends" process is not clearly explained to users; in particular, Facebook does not mention that the entire address book is uploaded and retained [1].
I want to raise a new and distinct privacy risk for doctors and their patients: if doctors on Facebook happen to have patients in their web mail address books, and they use "find friends", then it is possible for associations between individuals and their doctors to inadvertently become public. For doctors working in mental health, sexual health, family planning, substance abuse and so on, naming their patients could have catastrophic consequences.
"Find friends" operates through an automatic web interface provided by Facebook to participating web mail services, such as Gmail, Hotmail and Yahoo. How likely is it that a patient might appear in their doctor's web mail address book? E-mail increasingly figures in the way many healthcare professionals interact with their patients. More and more patients are pressing their doctors to make use of e-mail and other online media, since they are routine now in so many walks of life.
Usually, doctors will have a specific workplace e-mail account, but some don't have the option. Many allied health professionals, counsellors, specialists and the like run their sole practices as small businesses. They don't have a major investment in IT, nor a deep understanding of the technology. Many such medicos do use web mail with patients. Further, web mail is being re-branded in the market as a "cloud" service, offered to businesses as a cost-effective alternative to managing their own e-mail domains (I note that the e-mail address for correspondence with the authors of the paper in question is a Gmail address). So the line may blur between private and workplace e-mail usage. Chillingly, Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg has shown a degree of contempt for people who feel the need to operate separate digital identities [2].
One way or another, including simply by accident, patient contact details will inevitably appear in some doctors' web mail address books. As a result, if a doctor signs up to Facebook and innocently allows "find friends" then Facebook will import e-mail addresses, some of which may be for patients. Note carefully that these individuals never have the chance to consent to being imported; they don't even know it's happening. Subsequently, others on Facebook will come automatically to learn that individuals are associated with doctors, indicating they may be patients of those doctors.
In conclusion, healthcare professionals using web mail should be warned against the risks to patient privacy should they join Facebook and use "find friends". Wherever possible, providers should use separate professional and personal e-mail accounts, but because this may not always be possible, and because accidental crossover may occur, the warning about "find friends" remains important.
[1] Wilson S, Johnston J, More trouble with Facebook. Privacy Law Bulletin 2010;7.2:25-8.
[2] Michael Zimmer blog, Facebook's Zuckerberg: "Having two identities for yourself is an example of a lack of integrity" 14 May 2010 http://michaelzimmer.org/2010/05/14/facebooks-zuckerberg-having-two- identities-for-yourself-is-an-example-of-a-lack-of-integrity (accessed 18 Dec 2010).
Conflict of Interest:
None declared
Show Less

Conflict of Interest:
None declared.
- Back to top

Main menu

Plain text

PLEASE NOTE:

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

Jump to comment:

Conflict of Interest:

Conflict of Interest:

Log in using your username and password

Main menu

Log in using your username and password

You are here

Plain text

PLEASE NOTE:

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

Jump to comment:

Conflict of Interest:

Conflict of Interest:

Read the full text or download the PDF:

Log in using your username and password

Other content recommended for you