Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Moral duties and euthanasia: why to kill is not necessarily the same as to let die
  1. Hugh McLachlan
  1. Correspondence to Professor Hugh McLachlan, School of Law and Social Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK; h.mclachlan{at}


David Shaw's response to Hugh McLachlan's criticism of his proposed new perspective on euthanasia is ineffectual, mistaken and unfair. It is false to say that the latter does not present an argument to support his claim that there is a moral difference between killing and letting die. It is not the consequences alone of actions that constitute their moral worth. It can matter too what duties are breached or fulfilled by the particular moral agents who are involved.

  • Euthanasia
  • assisted suicide
  • doctor-patient relationship
  • killing
  • letting die
  • applied and professional ethics
  • philosophical ethics

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.


  • Competing interests None.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Other content recommended for you